Core Leadership Principles · Session 1
What leadership actually is, why it's a learnable skill rather than a personality trait, and how this curriculum is built.
Loading…
Explore
Click any session below to read it.
Want the class, not just the write-up?
Get the full Core Leadership Principles module on video, plus the workbook, templates, and every other module, as part of the Self-Paced Program.
Ask ten people to define leadership and you'll get ten different answers, most of them vague enough to be useless. "Inspiring others." "Setting a vision." "Being a good example." All true in some sense. None of it actionable on a Tuesday morning when someone on your team is underperforming and you don't know what to say to them.
So let's start with a working definition instead of an inspirational one:
Leadership is the set of behaviors that make a group of people more effective together than they would be on their own.
Notice what's missing from that definition: charisma, a title, being an extrovert, having all the answers. Those things can help. None of them are the job.
They overlap, but they're not the same thing. Conflating them is where a lot of new managers go wrong.
You can manage a project without leading anyone. You can lead a team you have zero formal authority over. The best people in both individual contributor and management tracks eventually need both skill sets, in different proportions.
The most common belief about leadership, and the most damaging one, is that it's innate. You either have "it," or you're destined to be a competent-but-forgettable manager. This belief is comfortable because it lets people off the hook. If leadership is a trait, you can't be blamed for not having it, and you don't have to do the work of building it.
I don't buy it. This curriculum is built on the opposite premise: leadership is a set of skills, and skills are trainable. Listening well is trainable. Giving feedback that lands is trainable. Making a hard call under incomplete information is trainable. None of it is mystical. It's practice, feedback, and repetition, same as any other skill.
That doesn't mean it's easy. Some of this will feel uncomfortable, especially the communication work later in this curriculum. Discomfort is a normal part of building a skill you don't have yet. It's not a sign you're not cut out for this.
Nan-in, a Japanese Zen master during the Meiji era, received a university professor who came to ask him about Zen. Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept pouring. The professor watched the tea overflow until he couldn't hold back any longer. "It's overfull. No more will go in!"
"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"
Shaseki-shu, Case One
I open with this story every single cohort. It's the most honest thing I can tell a room full of new managers before we start. Most people walk in with a cup that's already full: a strong opinion about what leadership is, usually formed by watching one bad manager and promising themselves they'd never do that, or watching one good manager and assuming leadership just means being like them. Both are full cups. Neither leaves room for anything new to actually land.
This curriculum won't do much for you if you're spending each session defending a position instead of testing one. Come in ready to have your cup emptied a little, session by session. That's not a sign you didn't know anything. It's the actual mechanism by which you end up knowing something you didn't before.
Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.
Attributed to Aristotle
Emptying your cup only works if you know what's in it. Before you sit through a single session on strategy or feedback or delegation, it's worth taking an honest inventory of where you actually stand today, not where you assume you stand.
Below is a short self-assessment across ten leadership traits. Rate yourself honestly, not aspirationally. Then take it again at the end of this course. Some people find the number barely moves and they've simply gotten more honest about where they were. Others find real gaps closed. Either result tells you something true, and you won't know which one is yours until you compare the two.
Five modules, in a deliberate order:
Each one builds on the last. Communication is what makes strategy real instead of a slide nobody remembers. Strategy is what gives a team something worth building. None of it works in isolation. That's why we're covering it as a system rather than a grab-bag of tips.
By the end, the goal isn't for you to have memorized a framework. It's to have a default way of operating, one you reach for automatically, under pressure, without having to think about it. That only comes from working through the material, not just reading it. Treat the sessions ahead the same way.
For Discussion
Should AI systems ever be given significant leadership roles in tech companies? What are the potential benefits and risks of AI-driven leadership?
Watch what happens to Ёжик (Hedgehog) in this short clip. His group needs to learn a routine for an upcoming holiday show. Nobody wants to commit to a schedule, so the group defaults into naming a "responsible one," and the job lands on him. Not because he asked for it. Not because he's good at organizing people. Just because someone had to be picked. He spends the episode chasing down teammates who keep deflecting ("not today, not Wednesday, not Friday either"), and when the group still hasn't learned the routine in time, they turn on him. "Why didn't you organize us? We were counting on you." Someone even suggests he start writing people's names down and threatening punishment, since asking nicely clearly isn't working.
I show this clip early in the curriculum because it's a more honest picture of how most people actually become leaders than anything in a textbook. Nobody handed Hedgehog a title, a plan, or any real authority. He got the job because the group needed someone to blame if things went wrong, and being "in charge" turned out to mean carrying the weight of everyone else's excuses. That's the accidental-leader problem in miniature: you can end up responsible for an outcome without ever being given the tools, the buy-in, or even the willingness to make it happen.
Two things worth noticing. First, the group's instinct wasn't to fix the scheduling problem together, it was to find someone to hold accountable once it failed. Second, the "solution" offered to Hedgehog was coercion: write down who's slacking, threaten punishment. That's usually where leadership goes when persuasion hasn't worked and nobody's taught you a better option. Neither instinct is malicious. It's just what happens by default when a group needs someone in charge and nobody's thought through what that role actually requires.
The book someone hands Hedgehog is worth sitting with a little longer, because it's really a stand-in for power. Organizing people who didn't choose to follow you runs on one of two fuels. Either you have genuine buy-in, people commit because they actually want the outcome, or you have real authority, and compliance isn't optional. Hedgehog has neither. Nobody chose him, so there's no real buy-in behind his deadlines. Nobody gave him actual authority either, so he has nothing to enforce a deadline with. The book is what's left when both are missing: a threat, reached for because persuasion stopped working and there's no power to fall back on. That's the practical shape of a bigger rule. If you're asking people to do something they didn't choose on their own, you need one of the two. Skip both, and you're not leading. You're just hoping it works out.
Closing that gap, between being handed responsibility and actually knowing what to do with it, is exactly what the rest of this curriculum is for.
Sources and Further Reading
On why purpose moves people more reliably than instruction does. A useful companion to the question of what leadership actually is.
These are Amazon affiliate links. If you buy through one, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only link books I actually use and recommend.